Case 03
Client name withheld

A regenerative-care practice found the channel that worked.

Industry

Health and wellness, Florida, US

My role

Director of Digital Advertising (in-house)

Timeframe

First four weeks

Channels

Meta lead generation, CRM, analytics

−30%

Cost per lead vs the blended average

28

Leads by week four

$49.10

Cost per lead on the winning route

The challenge

Generate qualified inquiries for a premium regenerative-care offer, and learn which route deserved the budget.

What I did

01

Ran instant-form and website campaigns side by side to compare cost and quality.

02

Built a high-intent lead form with phone verification, qualifying questions mapped into the CRM, and a redirect into the consultation journey.

03

Repaired reporting so traffic sources were credited correctly, giving budget decisions a trustworthy base.

04

Moved budget to the stronger route as soon as the evidence was clear.

Results (week four)

Total leads

28 at $69.70 blended cost per lead

Instant-form campaign

27 leads at $49.10, about 30% below the blended average

Website campaign

1 lead, budget reallocated

What made the difference

Testing two routes honestly and acting fast, instead of defending the original plan.

“

Milton works exceptionally hard to please on every order. He responds quickly and is proactive. Milton is very strategic and has a tremendous knowledge base.

★★★★★ · Practice owner, US healthcare

Evidence note. Lead results only; bookings and revenue are not reported here. Client name withheld; references available once we’ve spoken.

Want this kind of system in your business?